The situation discussed in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, currently being co-sharers, were being homeowners in the land. The match was at first dismissed, but on attraction, it was decreed in favor with the respondents. The concepts proven in these rulings supply a sturdy authorized framework https://landenstefe.blogolize.com/indicators-on-co-ownership-and-partition-lawyer-in-karachi-you-should-know-70281305